So just like in the original tale, it’s Gretel who saves the day by using her newfound powers to kill the witch and save her brother – but instead of the kids returning home, Gretel has a friendly horse take Hansel away to the convent – and Gretel remains in the woods, taking over residence of the cottage and vowing in the narration that. Gretel and Hansel. Gretel & Hansel Review: A reboot that sends chills down the spine Some of the horror releases earlier this year turned out to be absolute duds and damp squibs. Then when Gretel & Hansel hit cinemas with limited fanfare.
Some scary, shocking moments. Creepy nightmare scenes. A zombie-like monster attacks the kids; Gretel knocks its eye out with a rock, and it's shot in the head.
A bucket of guts and body parts is dumped on a table, with a severed baby's arm tossed on top. A character is burning/on fire, screaming in pain. Blood seeps through sheets during a nightmare. A character inserts a red-hot poker into his mouth with the intention of killing himself (nothing is shown). A horse keels over and dies. Black, blood-like goop shown in several scenes.
Parents need to know that Gretel & Hansel is a horror movie based on the classic Brothers Grimm fairy tale, but it's not for young kids. Expect plenty of scary moments and nightmare scenes. A zombie-like monster attacks, its eye is knocked out with a rock, and it's shot in the head. A witch who's being burned screams in agony.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Smash Dude® at Amazon.com. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users.
A bucket of guts and body parts is dumped on a table, and some blood is shown seeping through a sheet. Other black, goopy, blood-like stuff is shown. A character puts a red-hot poker into his mouth, and a horse keels over and dies. A man asks a teen girl about her virginity (he inquires whether her 'maidenhood' is 'intact'), and she gets her period. Language is quite mild, with just a couple of uses of 'hell.'
Hungry children eat mushrooms in the forest and experience a brief, mild drug trip. Casual horror fans may find this one a bit too arty and not scary enough, but for bolder viewers, it will hit the spot. In GRETEL & HANSEL, it is a time of famine and hardship. A widow, at her wits' end, throws her children out of the house to fend for themselves. Older sister Gretel takes charge of her younger brother, Hansel , but it's not long before they get hungry. A hunter helps them along, and soon they find a house with an inviting feast laid out on the table. An old woman invites the children in and allows them to stay, for a little while, in exchange for doing some chores.
Gretel fears that something is wrong, but then the old woman starts teaching her about how to unleash her inner, hidden strengths. Everything seems to be going fine. until Hansel disappears. This strange, austere, artful, violent retelling of the old fairy tale is one of those movies that's more moody than scary. It won't be to every taste, but it's weirdly poetic and mesmerizing. With Gretel & Hansel and two previous chillers ( The Blackcoat's Daughter, I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House), director - the son of star Anthony Perkins - has established himself as a confident, patient creator of chills who takes risks and is decidedly out of the mainstream. His focus on framing, textures, shapes, silences, and music - rather than jump scares, shocks, or screaming - makes his films a little harder to sell.His Gretel & Hansel, with Gretel now coming first in the title, is also a story about women. Triangles permeate the film, suggesting the strength of both the witch and Gretel, and Perkins plays around with other recurring themes and symbols, too.
The overall tone can feel a bit academic and perhaps a bit chilly, but the casting saves the day. Lillis, who was so delightful and spunky in the two films, warms up her scenes with her character's younger brother, and Krige (the Borg Queen in ) has a slithery quality that makes her witch somehow hypnotic. The throwback electronic music score by French composer Rob also helps create an unsettling, otherworldly quality. But overall, this is a movie about a young woman moving from a defensive position in the world to a more powerful offensive one.Families can talk about Gretel & Hansel's. How much is shown and not shown? How did it make you feel?.Is the movie?
What's the appeal of horror movies?.How does this movie compare to the fairy tale? Why do we tell fairy tales, and why are they passed on from generation to generation?.Gretel says, 'nothing is given without something being taken away.' Do you think that's true? Why or why not?.Do you think the movie has strong female characters?
Sanctum inle resort. In what ways are their strengths shown? Do you consider them?
It had a rotten score on Rotten Tomatoes, and I wasn’t so sure if I was going to see it or not because of that. Then, I remembered watching “I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in The House” which I actually liked, and it was directed by the same person (Osgood Perkins). This, and the fact that I love horror movies, are the reason I went to see it. It’s quite artistic and there aren’t much jumpy moments, but I found it to be interesting and genuinely creepy.
It’s certainly not everybody’s cup of tea, but I think fans of atmospheric horror will enjoy it. I really liked the mythology / backstory elements. It was shot beautifully.
And Alice Krige's performance was really great.7/10But I felt like the ending conflicted with itself. I'm almost positive it had some sort of interference where there wasn't supposed to be narration.
I feel like the kids leaving the trees was also added after. Maybe it was supposed to end in a grim way like movies of these type usually do (The Witch), but it ends on a happy-ish note, which I thought conflicted with her hands turning gray. I thought is movie was atrocious. It's horrendously boring. Glacial pacing with no build up or suspense, and a clear lack of any structure. Nothing to any of the characters and the story of Gretel becoming a woman has no depth to it. It's certainly not scary, with hardly any atmosphere, mostly because it looked so cheap.
The production design and costumes felt like high school theater and the cinematography. This film is a prime example of why not to shoot day for night.Sophia Lillis is the only bright spot, and she's only just okay because the script is so terrible. On the other hand, the kid who played Hansel is one of the worst child actors I have ever seen. Totally inconsistent accent that made his mouth sound like it was made of marbles.
He's so wooden and stilted, I would have rather had Jake Llyod. Any time he was off screen was a relief. The Witch is far from scary too and never feels like a genuine threat.All Gretel & Hansel did, along with The Grudge and Dolittle, was reinforce that January is clearly the dumping ground for some of the worst of the worst movies. What a disappointment from director Oz Perkins.